chap 17

1. Can Levine be given 100% credit of the reproduction of Weston's original work? 2. Is there a certain degree to how much appropriation is actually appropriation and not just plagiarism? Or is it just subjective? 3. How different wold the impact be if a student appropriated the image like Levine? I just think its interesting that since Levine "appropriated the image" its creates a debate, however I feel like if a student did it, people would just say its plagiarism. Even know students and professors have a certain standard in a university, I still just think its interesting that we learn about artists who does work that we would get in trouble for. 4. Does Levine's work really not have authorship? The book states that "To refuse authorship itself functions to puncture the ideology of the artists as the bearer of a privileged subjectivity." I disagree because I feel like she is still have authorship because it is still her photograph that she subjectively chose to photograph. 5. is it considered plagarism is a photographer, painter, drawer all created the same exact composition and image?